![]() In fact, if the art shies away from reflecting these conditions, it can risk commercial failure. My main point here is to show how popular art reflects the economic conditions which it is embedded in. By differences here, I mean very significant underlying premises and values, and these reflect the tenor of their respective times: the 1960s in the case of James Bond and the 2000s in the case of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies.Īs for James Bond, that well-known franchise has been around for almost 50 years, and naturally later films reflect more recent ideas and social conditions, but nevertheless, the original James Bond movies from the 1960s and 1970s are the foundation of the franchise, while later ones merely ‘update’ the old formula. Yet, a closer look at each character and the movies they inhabit provides throws into sharp focus the vast differences separating the films. Both are seemingly mesmerizing to movie audiences and have led their respective film franchises, the James Bond series and Pirates of the Caribbean, to huge fortunes in box office revenue: billions of dollars for each franchise. Both appeal to the opposite sex.īoth are good-looking, quick with comebacks, original in their approaches to adversity, and adroit with weapons. Commander James Bond and Captain Jack Sparrow. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |